Relationship between color-coded anatomical M-Mode, strain imaging, and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in the assessment of myocardial asynchrony in normal subjects
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the time to peak systolic contraction time (Tc) by color-coded anatomical M-mode (AMM), time to peak systolic strain (Tst) by strain rate imaging (SRI), and the time to peak systolic velocity (Ts) by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in the left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) segments of normal subjects. We also sought to determine the relationship between these methods for defining asynchrony indices in normal subjects.
Methods: Conventional echocardiography, color-coded AMM, SRI, and TDI were performed on 44 healthy adult volunteers (in Tehran heart center and Dr. Shariati hospital) to measure Tc, Tst, and Ts for 12 LV and 2 RV segments in the mid and basal levels. Additionally, the delay and the standard deviation (SD) were measured in all 12 and basal LV segments.
Results: In 12 LV and 2 RV segments, Tc by AMM and Tst by SRI were significantly higher than Ts by TDI (P < 0.001). Tc and Tst had no significant differences in 8 LV and 2 RV segments (P < 0.05); however, there were meaningful differences between Tc and Tst only in the anterior and inferior walls. There was a moderate correlation between AMM and SRI for asynchrony in all and basal LV segments and the SD of all and basal LV segments. There was no correlation between AMM and TDI in defining asynchrony indices. There was a weak correlation between TDI and SRI apropos of asynchrony in all and basal LV segments and the SD of all and basal LV segments.
Conclusion: Tc by AMM and Tst by SRI were significantly higher than Ts by TDI in LV and RV segments. There was no correlation between AMM and TDI in defining asynchrony indices.
2. Bax JJ, Marwick TH, Molhoek SG, Bleeker GB, van Erven L, Boersma E, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure before pacemaker implantation. American Journal of Cardiology 2003; 92(10): 1238-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.06.016.
3. Seo Y, Ito H, Nakatani S, Takami M, Naito S, Shiga T, et al. The role of echocardiography in predicting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society 2011; 75(5): 1156-63. 2011/03/09. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0861.
4. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 2008; 117(20): 2608-16. 2008/05/07. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.743120.
5. Strotmann JM, Kvitting J-PE, Wilkenshoff UM, Wranne B, Hatle L, Sutherland GR. Anatomic M-Mode Echocardiography: A New Approach to Assess Regional Myocardial Function—A Comparative In Vivo and In Vitro Study of Both Fundamental and Second Harmonic Imaging Modes. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 1999; 12(5): 300-07. doi: 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70050-7.
6. Mele D, Pedini I, Alboni P, Levine RA. Anatomic M-mode: a new technique for quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function. American Journal of Cardiology 1998; 81(12): 82G-85G. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00060-5.
7. Oyama MA, Sisson DD. Assessment of cardiac chamber size using anatomic M-mode. Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association 2005; 46(4): 331-6. 2005/10/19. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00062.x.
8. Katsuki K, Nakatani S, Kanzaki H, Hanatani A, Tanaka N, Nakasone I, et al. [Clinical validation of accuracy of anatomical M-mode measurements: effect of harmonic imaging]. Journal of cardiology 2001; 37(1): 35-42. 2001/02/24.
9. Sadeghian H, Ahmadi F, Lotfi-Tokaldany M, Kazemisaeid A, Fathollahi MS, Goodarzynejad H. Ventricular Asynchrony of Time-to-Peak Systolic Velocity in Structurally Normal Heart by Tissue Doppler Imaging. Echocardiography 2010; 27(7): 823-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01156.x.
10. Nikdoust F, Sadeghian H, Lotfi-Tokaldany M. (2016) Regional quantification of left atrial early diastolic strain in two groups of patients with mitral stenosis: normal sinus rhythm vs atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography 2016; 33: 1818– 1822. doi: 10.1111/echo.13360
11. Sakamaki F, Seo Y, Atsumi A, Yamamoto M, Machino-Ohtsuka T, Kawamura R, et al. Novel dyssynchrony evaluation by M-mode imaging in left bundle branch block and the application to predict responses for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of cardiology 2014; 64(3): 199-206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.12.013.
12. Burgess MI, Jenkins C, Chan J, Marwick TH. Measurement of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a comparison of real-time three-dimensional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2007; 93(10): 1191-96. 03/07. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.101626.
Files | ||
Issue | Articles In Press | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Anatomical M-Mode; Tissue Doppler Imaging; Asynchrony; Strain Rate Imaging; Normal Heart |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |