Systems-Level in Silico Bioinformatic Profiling Identifies Key Hub Genes and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Atrial Fibrillation Without Overt Comorbidity
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. AF occurring in individuals without structural heart disease or conventional risk factors, currently referred to as AF without overt comorbidity, remains poorly understood. Genetic susceptibility is thought to contribute, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are incompletely defined. This study aimed to identify key genes and biological processes associated with AF without overt comorbidity using an in-silico bioinformatics approach.
Methods: Genes associated with AF without overt comorbidity were retrieved from the GeneCards database using a knowledge-based, database-driven strategy. Functional enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology biological processes was performed using WebGestalt. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was conducted using STRING and visualized in Cytoscape. Hub genes were identified exclusively using the Density of Maximum Neighborhood Component (DMNC) algorithm via the CytoHubba plugin. Three-dimensional protein structures of selected hub genes were modeled using SWISS-MODEL and evaluated using PROCHECK for exploratory structural characterization.
Results: Eighty-one genes associated with AF without overt comorbidity were identified. PPI analysis demonstrated significant interaction enrichment (P<1.0×10⁻¹⁶), indicating a nonrandom and biologically coherent network. Functional enrichment analysis revealed cardiac muscle cell action potential and cardiac muscle contraction as the most significantly enriched biological processes. Ten hub genes were identified based on DMNC ranking. Among these, GPD1L, SCN1B, SCN4B, and KCNE2 showed central network positions and acceptable stereochemical quality in exploratory structural evaluation.
Conclusion: This in silico study identifies candidate genes and biological processes potentially involved in AF without overt comorbidity. The findings are hypothesis generating and warrant further functional and clinical validation.
2. Antoun I, Layton GR, Nizam A, Barker J, Abdelrazik A, Eldesouky M, et al. Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation: Bridging the Gap Between Mechanisms, Risk, and Therapy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(2):362.
3. Lancellotti P, Miraglia V. Valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation: advances in mechanisms, risk stratification, and therapeutic approaches. Acta Cardiol. 2025;80(6):535-40.
4. Zhang Y, Dedkov EI, Teplitsky D, Weltman NY, Pol CJ, Rajagopalan V, et al. Both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism increase atrial fibrillation inducibility in rats. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(5):952-9.
5. Kim EJ, Yin X, Fontes JD, Magnani JW, Lubitz SA, McManus DD, et al. Atrial fibrillation without comorbidities: prevalence, incidence and prognosis (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:138-44.
6. Potpara TS, Lip GY. Lone atrial fibrillation: what is known and what is to come. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(4):446-57.
7. Thomas V, Schulein S, Millar RNS, Mayosi BM. Clinical characteristics and outcome of lone atrial fibrillation at a tertiary referral centre: the Groote Schuur Hospital experience. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(5):268-72.
8. Wyse DG, Van Gelder IC, Ellinor PT, Go AS, Kalman JM, Narayan SM, et al. Lone atrial fibrillation: does it exist? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1715-23.
9. Khaleghparast S, Maleki M, Rafiee F, Karimian S, Sari L, Mazloomzadeh S. The Association of Perceived Stress and Atrial Fibrillation. Res Heart Yield Transl Med 2025; 20(3):185-192.
10. Andreasen L, Nielsen JB, Olesen MS. Genetic aspects of lone atrial fibrillation: what do we know? Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(5):667-78.
11. GeneCards. The Human Gene Database. Available from: https://www.genecards.org. Accessed Oct 2025.
12. Liao Y, Wang J, Jaehnig EJ, Shi Z, Zhang B. WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W199-205.
13. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D607-13.
14. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498-504.
15. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W296-303.
16. UCLA–DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics. SAVES v6.0: Structure Analysis and Verification Server. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/.
17. Roberts JD, Gollob MH. Impact of Genetic Discoveries on the Classification of Lone Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(8):705-12.
18. Andersen JH, Andreasen L, Olesen MS. Atrial fibrillation—a complex polygenetic disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(7):1051-60.
19. Huang Z, Luo C, Wu Z, Zheng B. Electrophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Calcium Channels in Atrial Fibrillation. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26(6):33507.
20. Ahlberg G, Refsgaard L, Lundegaard PR, Andreasen L, Ranthe MF, Linscheid N, et al. Rare truncating variants in the sarcomeric protein titin associate with familial and early-onset atrial fibrillation. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4316.
21. Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54(2):230-46.
22. Li RG, Wang Q, Xu YJ, Zhang M, Qu XK, Liu X, et al. Mutations of the SCN4B-encoded sodium channel β4 subunit in familial atrial fibrillation. Per Med. 2018;15(2):93-102.
23. Denti F, Paludan-Müller C, Olesen SP, Haunsø S, Svendsen JH, Olesen MS, et al. Functional consequences of genetic variation in sodium channel modifiers in early onset lone atrial fibrillation. Int J Mol Med. 2013;32(1):144-50.
24. Olesen MS, Jespersen T, Nielsen JB, Liang B, Møller DV, Hedley P, et al. Mutations in sodium channel β-subunit SCN3B are associated with early-onset lone atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(4):786-93.
25. Nielsen JB, Bentzen BH, Olesen MS, David JP, Olesen SP, Haunsø S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations in potassium channel subunit KCNE2 associated with early-onset lone atrial fibrillation. Biomark Med. 2014;8(4):557-70.
26. Lundby A, Ravn LS, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S, Olesen SP, Schmitt N. KCNE3 mutation V17M identified in a patient with lone atrial fibrillation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2008;21(1-3):47-54.
27. Watanabe H, Darbar D, Kaiser DW, Jiramongkolchai K, Chopra S, Donahue BS, et al. Mutations in sodium channel β1- and β2-subunits associated with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(3):268-75.
28. Jabbari J, Olesen MS, Holst AG, Nielsen JB, Haunso S, Svendsen JH. Common polymorphisms in KCNJ5 are associated with early-onset lone atrial fibrillation in Caucasians. Cardiology. 2011;118(2):116-20.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 21 No 1 (2026) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v21i1.21282 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Bioinformatics In Silico Atrial Fibrillation Without Overt Comorbidity Hub Genes Protein–Protein Interaction | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |

